Showing posts with label France. Show all posts
Showing posts with label France. Show all posts

The International Food Name Conspiracy: The April 1st Post

I’m looking to inject this blog with more nationalism and xenophobia in order to court controversy and consequently increase web traffic. I would consider a “diplomatic incident” the pinnacle of achievement in this regard. So, without further adieu delay, here are some examples of other countries’ attempts at misleading American citizens into seeming stupid/eating something gross. (My conception of geopolitical machinations approximates rival frat houses having a prank war. If you happen to work in international politics and have a better understanding, or know anything about it, please send me an email.)


German chocolate cake: In an act of sabotage lacking the subtlety of our craftier foes, the Kaiser planted a deep cover operative on our soil in the 1850s. His name was Sam German. (Such a pseudonym confirms that espionage was not the Kaiser’s strong suit.) Using his own baking chocolate recipe, German created a unique chocolate cake with more layers than a spy thriller. His employer, Baker’s Chocolate Company, named a new baking chocolate in his honor: Baker’s German’s Sweet Chocolate. Germany’s gambit was successful: 162 years later, and most people ascribe this delicious confection—an American creation— to our erstwhile ally. Well played, Germany, well played.


Refried Beans: In an effort to deprive us of a (clearly beneficial) second frying, the conniving chefs of Mexico called their bean concoction frijoles refritos, knowing, I’m certain, that we would mistranslate the name. Where I come from (AMERICA), when you attach “re” to something, that means you’re fixin’ to do it again. Apparently, they do things a little different down south: in Mexican Spanish, “re” means “well,” or “very.” Thus, “well-fried beans.” The rub here is that these beans are often baked, not fried. Well played, Mexico, old chap. Or should I say “replayed?”  


Sweetbreads: Picture a fluffy cinnamon-infused dough, glazed with cream cheese icing and sprinkled with candied almonds. Now take that picture and set it on fire. “Sweetbreads” have less to do with sweets or bread, and more to do with thymus glands and calf pancreas. England is our oldest enemy (temporary alliance notwithstanding), and it’s fitting that England is a frequent culprit when it comes to naming foods in a purposefully misleading manner. This one goes deep: some 12th-century rascal decided the word for “flesh” or “meat” should be brǣd, and so shall the unsuspecting expect scones and receive gullets for all time. England: 1. Guy hoping for biscotti and getting pancreas: 0.    

Oranges: Geolurēad doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue. But before circa 1512, that’s the monstrosity you would have uttered in the English-speaking world when referring to the color nexus between yellow and red. Presumably embarrassed, the English language quickly sought something else to call the color. It found a solution in a tangerine-pomelo hybrid that the French were already calling orenge. The name was a mutation of the Arabic naranj, whose descendants can be seen in such words as the Spanish naranja. So the fruit name came before the color name. That this is a vast international conspiracy designed to humiliate the United States is proved by this simple fact: “oranges" grown in exclusively tropical weather are green, not orange. Green! Cold weather causes the chlorophyll to retreat, not unlike the sensation one has when jumping into a freezing pond.


Baby carrots: The name, “baby carrots,” is not misleading unto itself; baby carrots are, indeed, the infantile offspring of adult carrots, brought each spring to the carrot patch by an intrepid stork. What’s deceiving is the myth that baby carrots are simply large carrots, cut to less-intimidating specifications. The product resulting from that process is called a “baby-cut carrot.” “Baby carrots” are immature carrots, bred specifically for their diminutive size and sweeter taste. “Baby-cut carrots” seek to ride the tiny orange coattails of their legitimate cousins. I wish I could pin this on a foreign government. Alas, this is the work of good ole American marketing.


Canadian Bacon: The mendacity of Canadians generally is well-known, but never is their innate deviousness more apparent than when ordering Canadian bacon in Canada. What you and I, and every other red-blooded patriot, call “Canadian bacon” is either A) ham, or B) “back bacon.” While ham needs no explanation, back bacon, if you didn’t know, is a slice of pig which includes both belly and loin. This is a leaner bacon than the fatty belly bacon America calls its own. In a blatant display of Canadian culinary insanity, Canadians’ actual signature bacon—peameal bacon—is a cut of pork loin rolled in… peameal? No. Cornmeal. Typical.


Colonial goose: Not, in fact, goose, but rather lamb—coated in breadcrumbs and bacon. I suppose this is the sort of bait-and-switch we might expect from Australia, considering its somewhat… ahem… unsavory colonial origins.


Bear Claw:  This may sound like something one would wear around the neck to intimidate a village one is pillaging. Sadly not the case. An invader with a bear claw around his neck would likely be laughed back into his longboat, as the bear claw of modern times is an almond-flavored pastry. The shape, I suppose, resembles the the mighty paw of a dangerous apex predator, in the right light. But I still feel swindled. If you're struggling to find the scapegoat here, kindly recall that bear claws are a subspecies of Danish. 


Gunpowder Tea: This tea’s misleading name led to a very anticlimactic Fourth of July for this patriot. Do not be misled: this tea from the Guangdong and neighboring provinces of China will not explode, no matter what. It is so named for the small pellets into which the tea leaves are rolled, resembling coarse black powder. Or is it? The Mandarin phrase for “freshly brewed” is gāng pào de (). Say this quickly in English and the origin of the tea’s name becomes less certain. Another conspiracy.

Tune in next April 1st, when I shall unmask further clandestine treachery in the world of food!

Eating Your Green: An Expensive Food Spotlight

Golden Burger by Thomas Hannich and Arndt von Hoff
I’m really smart, so it’s a little discouraging to think that my 3 lbs of brain matter would only fetch about $100 on the open market, while three pounds of European white truffles are worth around $10,800. It hardly seems fair.

But the Law of Supply and Demand, unlike most laws, is not made to be broken. While there is only one of my brain—and that’s as rare as “rare” can get—that’s one more than the market will bear, at least at any kind of premium.


Things are worth what people can/will pay for them. Food is no exception. Statistics about food spending invite bizarre and disturbing thoughts. For instance, world hunger is a $30 billion/year problem, while European ice cream is an $12 billion/year industry. These things have no explicit relationship, but seeing them in the same sentence may still give one pause. Rather than explore the macroeconomic social issues surrounding food spending here in this blog, I'd like to focus on the personal.  


I’m sure I don’t have to tell you: my typical reader is extraordinarily wealthy, and suffers from anxiety about how to spend his/her nearly limitless free time and money. This is  the first of what I plan to be a sporadic series on mortgage-necessitating foods. Consider this a buyer’s guide series, helping you make a wise investment in your next burger or sundae. Before we get into specifics, keep in mind these fundamental truths:


  • Food begins to depreciate as soon as it leaves the store. 
  • Eating gold of less than 24k could be harmful. 
  • Most banks will flag the purchase of a $25,000 dessert as possible evidence of credit card fraud. You should pay in cash to remain below the radar.  
  • Foie gras and Oscillococcinum are both French-produced duck-liver-based products. But not all French duck liver products are created equal.
  • Expensive food can be divided into two categories, which I arbitrarily created just now:


Category 1: Intentionally Decadent Ingestibles Of Totally Inappropriate Cost. (Or I.D.I.O.T.I.C.s for short. Trademark pending.) These dishes are typically a hodgepodge of other, more naturally expensive foods. (“We start with truffles… and then smother them in gold!”) With a healthy dose of cost injection for labor and simply having all the necessary components in the same place, this sort of “destination fare” typically sports a price tag equaling the GDP of a small nation and a “wacky” name.


Category 2: “Naturally” expensive food. These single-element consumables are expensive due to rarity, demand, or necessity of extensive labor. This category includes truffles, saffron, and fine chocolate. I’d put 40-year old whiskey in this category, since its price is a function of factors associated with its production, despite the fact that designing a product that only matures when you’re hitting your midlife crises smacks of excess. This decadence is not exclusively contrived, though, as the product does undergo a physical evolution over time, rendering its increase in value at least somewhat proportional to its increase in cost.     

You are what you eat

There’s a sucker born every minute. But that constantly increasing supply isn’t diminishing the value of Swiss chocolatier Delafée's gourmet lollipops. (Here they are.) This "suggestive confection" is a 33.00 euro heart-shaped sucker dusted with edible gold. If you are struggling to think who might benefit most from this undeniably essential gift, the product description is fortunately explicit: it’s for “the princess who has everything.” If she is an actual princess, however, keep her away from the lollipaparazzi...


If you're worried about eating gold, don't be. Edible gold leaf is a mainstay of the Intentionally Decadent Ingestibles Of Totally Inappropriate Cost scene. Since 24k gold is chemically inert, you can eat as much as you can afford. (Yes, you can finally perform your one act play about King Midas struggling to eat his dinner.) Incidentally, edible gold leaf costs $120-$160/ gram. Considering the minimal weight of the lollipop’s included shavings, this confection is not, as you might have guessed, worth its weight in gold. You’ll be glad to know that the chocolatier who makes the pops also offers a gilding service, so you could actually coat your money in gold, too, before you throw it away.


Cost: about 46 USD.


Envy from your friends about your savvy purchase: priceless. You can’t put a price on lollipopularity.


Is it worth the money? No. You’re paying a lot for labor. You’re better off taking a cheese grater to some edible gold leaf and doctoring your own Yummy Earth lollipop. (Available at your local Foods For Living!)



When the going gets truff...

What does the Mafia have in common with Chinese farmers and climate change? While a full list of similarities would be too large to print, obviously, I refer to the threat they pose to the the French black truffle trade.


Climate change—or, to be apolitical about it, “a change in climate”— has resulted in some serious truffle reduction (truction). Before WWI, French soil was producing about 2,000 tons of truffles. These days, the yield is about 30 tons.


This scarcity has driven truffle prices and demand high enough for organized crime to take an interest. Even more valuable than the truffles themselves are the dogs that sniff them out. As a result, restaraunts and truffle hunters have had to employ security measures normally reserved for diamond couriers.


If that weren’t enough, China, a hotbed of comparatively tasteless truffles, has begun exporting about 28 tons of their rubbery dopplegangers per year. The truffles are greatly lacking in smell and taste, so identifying them shouldn’t be a problem. But enterprising (and dishonest) truffle traders (more like “traitors,” am I right?) are mixing in the Chinese truffles with the French and selling them in bulk. Truffle factories must now employ painstaking scrutiny to ensure that their customers are indeed receiving France’s famous culinary export. The corruption goes deep: some French companies sell Chinese truffles, which cost about $20/pound, and market them—legally—as French truffles, since they are packaged in France. Want to feel tuber-duper about your purchase? The package should be forthcoming if it’s a legitimate product. The French black truffle will also answer to Tuber melanosporum, while its Chinese counterpart goes by Tuber indicum. The party-ruiner in me must point out that a progressive invasion of plantation soil by Chinese truffle spores may just eradicate this distinction over time. Italy has already banned the importation of Chinese truffles, and many in France are advocating the same.


Let’s just hope the French truffle industry’s international mascot, Trufflupicus, stays healthy, because we need him now more than ever.


Cost: About $1600/pound.


Cost of a truffle hog: Seriously, no one uses pigs anymore. Nice try. These days, though, the truffle hound scene is “exploding.”

Are they worth the money? Well, you can walk into a locker room and get half the truffle experience for free. (Don’t just walk into a locker room, though.) But for a few shavings, sure. Places that serve genuine truffles are expensive, so you’ll probably go there for a special event or evening with someone you care about, and the whole endeavor will seem like a grand time because of your investment in it, and the truffle shavings will be delicious.

If you're short on cash, but have somehow developed a taste for top tier culinary finery, I'm going to let you in on something to fortify your income: according to Google, usually a destroyer of dreams, gold-dusted truffle lollipops are not yet a thing. But they could be...